& shy; There are many vehicles parked in the community, but there are two sets of charging standards. & shy; Fuzhou News Network April 29 News (Fuzhou Evening News reporter Ding SH Guan Yiwen/photo) A few days ago, ms. He, who lives in the provincial people’s social security department and the dormitory Provincial Department of Civil Affairs, found the director of the property office of the property management “Fu Zhongfu” property company in the community. She wanted to apply for the parking card of the community, but was told that “no card will be handled now”, why? It turned out that she was a tenant and questioned that there were two sets of standards for parking fees in the community, namely, “the owner is free, and the tenant is 120 yuan per month”, so she got the “treatment” like “Fu Zhongfu”. & shy; Community parking charges & shy; There are two sets of standards & shy; In March this year, Ms. He rented the provincial people’s social hall and Provincial Department of Civil Affairs dormitory community of Gulou district, in order to provide convenience for children to go to school. Like other owners with cars, ms. He also asked the property office for parking access card. What made her very uncomfortable was that she could not enjoy the free parking service like other owners because of her tenant status. The Property Office said that Ms. he had to pay the parking fee of 120 yuan per month. & shy; “also living here, owners park free of charge, but tenants have to pay parking fees. This double standard is really uncomfortable.” Ms. he told the reporter that she also paid property fees and fulfilled her obligations but did not enjoy the same rights, which was unfair. & shy; Just this Monday, Ms. he’s parking problem also caused an innocent community security guard to be scolded. Ms. he introduced to the reporter that on the same day, she drove the car into the community, sent the child home, and immediately drove the car out of the community. “Before it was far away, I heard that the security guard at the door was scolded by a man, which was very unpleasant, meaning that I shouldn’t let my car into the community.” When she saw such a scene, Ms He was not angry and immediately came forward to the property staff’s theory. & shy; “I set the charging standard” & shy; “since there is a charge, where is the basis?” Ms. He said that she felt that she had been treated unfairly. & shy; The morning before yesterday, the reporter found director he of the property office on the grounds of renting a house to inquire about the parking charges. “Parking is free for owners, and tenants have to pay 120 yuan per month.” Director he told the reporter that when the reporter asked how the charging standard was set, director he said it was set by the Industry Committee. The reporter interviewed several community owners immediately. They all said that there was no industry committee in the community, and the so-called parking fee standard was even more unknown. & shy; Then the reporter accompanied Ms. he to find director he again and said he would handle parking card. Director he saw that it was Ms. he who wanted to handle the card, and his face sank immediately, saying that he would not handle the card. When Ms. he asked director he why his statements were inconsistent and why he didn’t apply for a card, director he said, “I set the charging standard, but now I don’t apply for a card.” & shy; What surprised the reporter was that when the reporter showed her identity to director he, she totally rejected the statement that the previous charging standard was formulated by the Industry Committee, he said, “there is no industry committee now”, and then he stepped up and left. & shy; Property office: & shy; It is really inappropriate to use the previous standard & shy; The reporter then came to Kaiyuan community in Gulong Street. Shi Yuhong, deputy director of the community, contacted the relevant staff of fuzhongfu property company and agreed to hold a coordination meeting in the community together in the afternoon. & shy; The afternoon before yesterday, director he of the property office took the staff to Kaiyuan community. Director he said, “according to the situation we have, there are 260 households in the community, many of which are rental households, but there are only two or three tenants with cars. Our property company has been stationed in the community for 4 years, and the parking fee standard is used by the former property company.” At the scene, director he once again said that there was no industry committee in the community at present. The “industry committee” she mentioned earlier was actually temporarily organized by several owners’ representatives, “There is indeed no written documents and other charging credentials”. & shy; In the face of this matter, director he said that there were management flaws in the property office. Shi Yuhong suggested that the property office could convene the owners and tenants to agree on specific solutions, at least let all residents know the reason of the matter and let everyone have rules to follow. “We will report this matter to the leaders and strive to establish a Community industry committee to discuss solutions to the problem.” Director he said. & shy; Lawyer: & shy; No basis for such charges & shy; Lawyer Zhang Minjuan of Chuangyuan law firm said that there was no basis for the residential property office to charge 120 yuan for parking fees for tenants, because there was neither the charging standard stipulated in the previous property service contract, there is no parking fee standard set by the Industry Committee, and the Property Office has no basis to collect this money. In this case, tenants can report and complain to the price department.
