& shy; Due to a dispute over taking a taxi, the driver and the passengers staged a water battle. Passengers think that the driver’s attitude of deliberately increasing the price is bad, while the driver thinks that his personal information is leaked by passengers, causing himself to be harassed. & shy; These two days, the netizen “cute little Ling Ling” posted several microblogs saying that she met a driver with a bad attitude when she took a taxi using Didi ride software on the 6th. Judging from the screenshots of Weibo sent by netizens, the driver did say something ugly. The netizen told the reporter that the day before yesterday she planned to go to Mawei from Taihe Hongyu, Pushang Avenue, and booked a ride by using Didi Taxi software. At that time, the system was priced at 36.8 yuan. But soon after the driver called and said that the fare would be increased to 70 yuan, the netizen refused and said that the order could be canceled. Later, the netizen used another taxi software to book a car, and the final price was 131 yuan. “It’s not about money. The key is that drivers can’t increase the price maliciously. I ‘d rather spend more money than take the first driver’s car.” The netizen said that after that, the driver of Didi called and asked the netizen to cancel the order, but the netizen thought it was not his own fault and asked the driver to cancel the order by himself. Soon after, the netizen unexpectedly received a message from Didi Taxi software, which showed that the netizen had arrived at the destination by car and should pay the corresponding fare. “I didn’t take his car at all. Why should I pay? What’s worse, his attitude is extremely bad.” The netizen was very angry. & shy; Yesterday, the reporter contacted the driver Mr. Chen, who was planning to go to the police station to report the case. “I want to sue her because she leaked my personal information to the Internet, including my name, phone number and home address, which has seriously violated my rights and interests.” Mr. Chen said that from the day before yesterday, he received many harassing calls and text messages. He said that the quarrel belongs to the quarrel and personal information cannot be disclosed. “I admit that I have said some unpleasant words, and there is indeed a price increase behavior, but these are all for a reason.” Mr. Chen said that when he received the order the day before yesterday, the starting point shown by the system was not the same as the actual starting point. He thought that the route was not correct, so he proposed a price increase. However, the netizen refused, and the driver could only cancel the order twice a day. He asked the netizen to help cancel it, which was also rejected. He couldn’t take other orders without canceling the order, so he clicked the arrived destination button and the system automatically sent a message to the netizen asking him to pay the fare. “I didn’t mean to ask her to pay at all. I just wanted to solve the problem of this list as soon as possible.” Mr. Chen thought that his move was misunderstood by netizens, which caused a verbal battle. He said something he shouldn’t have said on impulse. However, the netizen “cute little Ling Ling” said that the driver information was sent by an enthusiastic netizen, which was not her personal intention. & shy; Lawyer Ren Linpeng of Beijing Yingke (Fuzhou) law firm believes that without the consent of the parties, no one is allowed to disclose the relevant information of others at will, otherwise it is an infringement. In addition, if personal information is disclosed to affect the lives of the parties concerned, the parties may advocate deleting network-related information to eliminate the impact, and may require individuals or groups that illegally disclose the information to publicly apologize and compensate for the losses. (Reporter Xu Qiang)